Stages of a Friendship
This article has been reposted from the archives of Shasta Nelson's blog. To see Shasta's latest work, please click here.
I'm trying to find vocabulary that increases our awareness of the stages of becoming friends.
Romance Stages and Friendship Stages
When it comes to marriage, we know that there is a lot of ground between being interested in someone and getting married to them. We have terms like "going on a date" which we know is different than "dating." We implicitly acknowledge that it takes time before we can both simply assume that we're hanging out this weekend without asking each other.
With female friendship we lack non-romantic language to articulate those stages.
Our expectations also seem to be a bit skewed of how fast we should progress. We appear to be at great risk of thinking we need to feel like BFF's within the first couple of conversations, forgetting that there are stages. We neglect the evidence in our memory banks that show us repeatedly that most of our friends developed over consistent time together (i.e. work, school, weekly gatherings).
In romance we know that, on average, it takes 1-2 years from meeting to marriage, but there are always some couples who elope after knowing each other for 2 weeks and others who date for ten years before getting married. In friendship, it's more-or-less the same. There will always be exceptions due to personality, life timing, willingness, etc. But more-or-less-- we'd be wise to set our expectations for the journey, even if it means it may take a year before I get to where I want to be with someone.
5 Stages of Friendship: In Rough Draft Form . . . :)
So here are five stages that I've identified so far. I'd love your input on whether you think this helps capture the process? What stage am I missing? What has been your experience, over the long-haul with your friendship development?
Curiosity. This is where every friendship begins. There has to be something that attracts you, gives you a sense of willingness and increases your desire to have more. It doesn't have to be conscious or obvious to us, but at this stage we have to have reason to lean in, even a little, if the stranger we're meeting is going to have a chance of becoming a friend.
Exploratory. Every potential friendship requires time together. For some of us, that time happens automatically (at a play group, a choir rehearsal, yoga class or work), but for many of us, we'll have to initiate it and pursue it. For it doesn't matter how much attraction you may feel in that first stage-- if you don't show up for time together-- a friendship it will never become.
Familiarity. This is the stage we often want as stage one. :) We frequently want to experience this comfort level with someone upon first meeting them, forgetting that it takes time to build. In my experience, I find that it takes most women 6-8 times with someone before they reach this stage. Of course that depends on what you're doing during that time and how you're sharing, but at some point you reach this familiarity. A trust that you can assume she wants to talk with you when you call. An ease where you're okay just hanging out spontaneously together without it taking two weeks to schedule. A sense that you are beginning to be able to predict how they will respond to different life events.
Vulnerability. This stage is tricky since there is a ditch on either side: rushing to it too quickly or avoiding it all together. Some women rush to this stage early on because they feel closer once they have shared their pain. But healthy friendships need the commitment to grow in conjunction with the intimacy. We should not be emotionally vomiting on someone in order to feel closer. It should not be our expectation that friends who are in the first couple of stages need to prove themselves and be there for us in extreme ways.
Frientimacy. This last stage is for those who are your BFFs. And notice that I made that plural. :) Best doesn't speak to quantity as much as quality. It's like when a magazine says "Best moments of last year" and lists ten. There is enough research out there to suggest we need between 3-7 people in this category. Don't limit yourself. On the other hand, not everyone you interact with needs to move into this last stage.
While few of our relationships will ever have clear lines between these stages, does it help to visually see that friendship is indeed a progression? Is it valuable to differentiate between seeing the potential of a BFF and putting in the time and vulnerability required to foster it? In general, does this align with your experience? And, if this were true, how could you see it helping you as you start new friendships?




Trong quá trình sử dụng smartphone, mình thường đánh giá website thông qua tốc độ tải và cách bố trí nội dung. Mình đã mở thử các chuyên mục slot, thể thao rồi đến game bài để kiểm tra khả năng điều hướng. Các thao tác diễn ra khá thuận tiện, thời gian chờ cũng không đáng kể. Qua việc tham khảo five88, mình thấy giao diện tương đối gọn gàng.
Sau khi thấy một vài người chia sẻ, mình cũng vào 789 f xem qua để tham khảo cách họ làm giao diện và phân chia chuyên mục. Cảm nhận ban đầu là trang web trình bày rất mạch lạc, bố cục cân đối và chia khu vực rõ ràng nên nhìn rất thoáng mắt. Thanh điều hướng cũng được làm trực quan, hiển thị đủ danh mục nên việc thao tác hay chuyển đổi giữa các phần nội dung cực kỳ nhanh chóng và thuận tiện.
Motchill giúp tôi đánh giá cách sắp xếp thông tin trong khu vực hướng dẫn sử dụng. Tôi chú ý cách chia chủ đề, thứ tự xuất hiện và mức độ dễ hiểu của từng phần giải thích. Khi xem Thể thao, Bắn cá và Game bài, tôi quan tâm liệu những nội dung hướng dẫn có được tách biệt với phần giới thiệu để người đọc dễ tìm kiếm hay không. Một cấu trúc hợp lý nên phân chia theo từng vấn đề cụ thể, thay vì tập trung nhiều chủ đề trong một đoạn dài. Với tôi, khả năng tra cứu nhanh là yếu tố quan trọng giúp người dùng tiếp cận thông tin thuận tiện hơn.
I often pay attention to the interface when first exploring an online entertainment platform. With drift boss I find the layout relatively simple, and the main content is easy to locate. Personally, I think this type of design is suitable for people who prefer to browse quickly without spending too much time getting familiar with the platform.
Trong quá trình đọc các thảo luận, mình có để ý thấy DN 88 được nhắc qua nên thử vào xem cho biết. Mình chỉ xem nhanh tổng thể chứ chưa tìm hiểu sâu, nhưng cảm giác ban đầu là cách trình bày khá thoáng, bố cục rõ ràng, nhìn vào không bị rối mắt.